Inventory Policy 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| What
is the best ordering policy for a warehouse to minimize cost, while meeting
demands? |
|
| The
warehouse has a limited storage capacity of 50000 cubic meters (m3). |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Holding
Cost |
Storage Space per unit (m3) |
Demand per month |
Ordering cost per order |
|
Storage space available (m3) |
|
|
| Product 1 |
$25 |
440 |
200 |
$50 |
|
50000 |
|
|
| Product 2 |
$20 |
850 |
325 |
$50 |
|
|
|
|
| Product 3 |
$30 |
1260 |
400 |
$50 |
|
|
|
|
| Product 4 |
$15 |
950 |
150 |
$50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Quantity to order each month |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
EOQ |
|
Cost |
|
Space used
(m3) |
|
| Product 1 |
10 |
28.28427 |
|
$1,125 |
|
2200 |
|
|
| Product 2 |
10 |
40.31129 |
|
$1,725 |
|
4250 |
|
|
| Product 3 |
10 |
36.51484 |
|
$2,150 |
|
6300 |
|
|
| Product 4 |
10 |
31.62278 |
|
$825 |
|
4750 |
|
|
| |
|
|
Total |
$5,825 |
|
17500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Problem |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| A
warehouse sells 4 products with a different demand for each product. Each
product has a different holding cost |
| and
requires a certain amount of space. What should the ordering policy for the
warehouse be, given its limited |
| storage
capacity? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Solution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| There
is an analytical solution for this problem, which is known as the Economic
Order Quantity (EOQ) and is |
| given
by the following formula: q = SQRT(2 k d/h), where q is the quantity to
order, k is the cost to place an order, |
| d
is the demand and h is the holding cost of the product. Unfortunately, this
formula doesn't always work in the real |
| world. Demand usually fluctuates, ordering time
is variable, and other factors arise to further complicate the |
| problem. In
this model we have one such factor, a limited storage space. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1)
The variables are the amounts to order each month for each product. These are
defined as Quantities in this |
| worksheet. By
changing these variables we change the total cost. |
|
|
|
|
| 2) The constraints are very simple. We have a logical
constraint and the storage capacity constraint. This gives |
| |
Quantities >= 0 via the Assume Non-Negative
option |
|
|
|
|
| |
Space_used <= Available_space |
|
|
|
|
|
| If the latter constraint wasn't present, the solution to
the problem could be calculated by the formula given above. |
| 3)
The objective is to minimize the total cost, which is defined as Total_cost.
It is calculated by adding the |
| individual
costs for each product. Those costs are calculated by using the formula: |
|
|
| Cost = h q /2
+ k d /q, where h, q, k and d are as above. |
|
|
|
|
| This
formula is easy to understand if we realize that the average inventory level
is q/2 and the average number of |
| orders is d/q. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Remarks |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| In this worksheet we have also calculated the EOQ with the
formula given above. Check to see that when you |
| increase the storage capacity and thus relax that
constraint, the answers found by the Solver will approach the |
| analytic
solution. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| This
model is an example of a non-linear problem, as can easily be seen by looking
at the cost formula. Whereas in |
| linear
problems it does not matter what are starting values for the variables are,
it can be very important to have |
| reasonable
starting values in non-linear problems. In this model it is not possible to
start with a quantity of 0, since |
| this would
cause an error in the calculation of the cost. |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Please
see for yourself that the Solver will still find the correct answer, even
when the starting values are close |
| (but not equal to) zero. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|